RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Income/Loss
FY 2001
generated $23.6 million in net income, a 47.8 percent decrease from FY
2000 net income of $45.2 million. income is a picture of fees earned compared
to costs incurred during a specific period of time, it is not necessarily
anindicator of net income or net loss over the life of a patent or trademark.
during the FY being reported, regardless of when the fees were collected.
net income or net loss is recorded for the patent business line. production
levels 3.5, 7.5, and 11.5 FYs ago rather than a reflection of productivity
levels in FY 2001. efees can have a significant impact on matching costs
and revenue. that begin and end the FY in various phases of their life
cycle. Net income for the FY is dependent upon the phase work has gone
through.
After several years of net income,
the patent business line experienced a net loss of $23.5 million in FY
2001. work processed begins to normalize earned revenues and costs over
the life cycle of patents to better approximate a $0 netincome. to total
application inventory, resulting in an additional $21.9 million of revenue
deferred in FY 2001. revenue deferred reduce net income, this change contributed
greatly to the patent business lines net loss.
The trademark business line incurred
a net income of $47.1 million in FY 2001 by completing large volumes of
work to fulfillorders received in prior years. rademarks operations
were able to address their backlog because of a temporary declinein new
applications submitted during FY 2001 and an 11.4 percent increase in
staff.
Components of Net Income/Loss
The following
charts depict the USPTOs financial operations for the past four
FYs. There have been gradual increases in both revenues and costs, indicating
steady growth.
D
D
Earned Revenue
Earned
revenue totaled $1,040.2 million for the year ended September 30, 2001,
an 8.8 percent increase over FY 2000 earned revenue of $956.5 million.
Of fees earned during FY 2001, $258.9 million related to revenue deferred
in prior FYs, $307.5 million related to maintenance fees collected during
FY 2001, which are immediately considered earned, and $473.8 million related
to work performed on fees collected during FY 2001.
Patent
business operations earned $859.0 million for FY 2001, a 5.1 percent increase
over $817.4 million in FY 2000. Revenue is earned at the current fee rate.
Filing, issue, and maintenance fees were raised slightly at the beginning
of FY 2001, accounting for the small increase in revenue.
D
Patent
maintenance fees have traditionally been the largest category of patent
fees. Therefore, fluctuations in rates of renewal can significantly affect
patent revenue. However, there can be no assurance that the USPTO will
be able to sustain or improve upon historic or current renewal rates in
future years. Rates of renewal continued to slowly climb in FY 2001.
|
PATENT RENEWAL RATES
|
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
FY2000 |
FY2001 |
|
First Stage
|
81.8%
|
83.1%
|
84.3%
|
84.5%
|
|
Second Stage
|
56.6%
|
57.9%
|
59.4%
|
59.9%
|
|
Third Stage
|
36.1%
|
37.7%
|
38.8%
|
39.1%
|
Trademark business operations earned
$181.2 million for FY
2001, a 30.3 percent increase from $139.1 million in FY 2000. This increase
is due to earning revenue
deferred in prior years that relates to
the large amount of prior year workload that was completed
during FY 2001. This drastically reduced the
amount of trademark work outstanding.
D
The USPTO charges a single fee for
the registration of both use-based and intent-to-use applications. Then,
another fee is charged for intent-to-use applications because these applications
require additional disclosures for trademark examiner review.
Trademark renewals are only required
if continued protection is requested. To some extent, renewals subsidize
costs incurred during the initial registration process. The large increase
in the rate of renewals in FY 2000 was due to a new requirement to pay
a renewal fee every 10 rather than every 20 years.
| TRADEMARK RENEWAL RATES |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
FY 2000 |
FY 2001 |
|
9.7%
|
9.6%
|
19.2%
|
21.2%
|
Program
Cost
Program
costs totaled $1,016.6 million for the year ended September 30, 2001,
an 11.6 percent increase over FY 2000 program costs of $911.3 million.
As a service organization, USPTO’s production was related directly
to personnel examining patent and trademark applications. Accordingly,
personnel services and benefits costs directly attributable to the two
business lines traditionally represent over one-half of total costs. Any
change or fluctuation in staffing or pay rate patterns directly affects
the change in total program costs. Total direct personnel services and
benefits costs increased 11.9 percent over the FY 2000 amount of $448.5
million, to $501.9 million for FY 2001. This change drove the increase
in total program cost and was due to several changes in pay scales.
In addition to the January 2001 federal-wide
3.8 percent increase in the general pay scale, as of June 2001, certain
patent examiners and other USPTO employees were switched to a new pay
schedule. This pay schedule covered over 3,600 employees and represented
approximately another 10 percent increase in pay for over half of the
workforce. While compensation per employee increased, hiring freezes and
attritions due to a change in appointed positions kept staffing increases
low. Without these decreases, personnel services and benefits costs would
have increased much more.
Rent, communications, utilities, contractual
services, and depreciation costs traditionally comprise a third of total
program costs each year. Contractual services directly attributable to
business lines increased 12.7 percent from $104.0 million in FY 2000 to
$117.2 million in FY 2001. Increases were incurred largely in the patent
business line as a response to increases in demand and a continued move
towards automated processes. Increases were incurred in a wide variety
of activities, such as a shift to 24/7 PALM support, other increased electronic
processing support, increased facilities research services, and increased
mail services.
Patent business operations cost $882.5
million for FY 2001, a 13.0 percent increase over the total patent program
cost of $781.3 million in FY 2000. Patent costs are spread over four main
patent products: utility patents, design patents, plant patents, or PCT.
The overall cost percentages presented below are a function of the volume
of applications processed in each product area rather than per unit costs.
The large majority of applications received are for utility patents, thus
utility patents represent the majority of costs. Cost percentages
are based on both direct costs and costs allocated to the patent business
line.
Trademark business operations cost
$134.1 million in FY 2001, a 3.2 percent increase over the total trademark
program cost of $130.0 million in FY 2000. While personnel and benefits
costs directly attributable to the trademark business increased 15.4 percent,
several other cost categories decreased in FY 2001 compared to FY 2000.
The most notable reason for the decreases is a refinement in the process
used to track information technology costs to customers. This refinement
resulted in the trademark business line receiving a smaller portion of
information technology costs than in the past, such as depreciation. In
addition, in FY 2001, the information dissemination function (IDO) shifted
to the information technology function. The information technology costs
therefore included IDO costs and the refinement resulted in lower IDO
costs for trademarks as well.
D
Trademark
costs are comprised of processing three main products: use based marks,
intent-to-use marks, and renewals after registration, which involves processing
affidavits, corrections, and amendments. The overall cost percentages
presented at right are a function of the volume of applications processed
in each product area rather than per unit costs. Cost percentages are
based on both direct costs and costs allocated to the trademark business
line. The intent to use costs include costs related to examining both
the application and the additional intent-to-use disclosures.
|